Policy Today

March 2017                    Circulation 70,621
Can the States Save the Federal Model? PDF Print E-mail
Written by PT Editors   
Tuesday, 10 July 2007
Digg!

 Image 

As coequal stewards of political legitimacy in the American Republic, senior legislators representing 18 states will join PT's Roundtable II to discuss the role they can—or should —play in our federal system.

Two hundred and twenty years ago, a distinguished group of statesmen assembled in Philadelphia to draft a new Constitution. They struggled to balance sectional interests and concerns about unrestrained power in a principled yet pragmatic document. But the ultimate source of political power was never in doubt: the consent of the governed. Decision-making authority was spread between the two levels and three separate branches, but political legitimacy—the right to govern—flowed through both national and state governments.

The republican model has since evolved through judicial interpretation and circumstance. But over the past century, its weight has tilted sharply toward Washington. The causes are many, but the nation now confronts the result: an executive that consumes national media attention and freely defends its “privilege” to do what it wants; a Congress hobbled by gerrymandered re-elections and a permanent campaign cycle in which only the partisan survive; and a Supreme Court that increasingly rules by single-member majorities and fragmented decisions.

Through their elected state and local governments, the citizenry of the country have borne the brunt of this political maelstrom across a well-publicized range of policy areas. These include: broader access to medical care, quality education, affordable housing, energy, immigration and criminal justice policies, and a proposed REAL ID program whose cost and impact remain virtually unknown to most Americans.

On August 8, senior legislators representing 18 states will join PT's Roundtable II in Boston. As coequal stewards of constitutional legitimacy, they will be asking, "What role can—or should—the states play in the federal partnership?" And ultimately, how do they
do it?

The discussion will focus on two principal topics: (1) Constitutional remedies, and (2) statewide unity. That is, can the states look to provisions such as the Electoral College and interstate compacts for relief? Or are they simply charged with becoming better lobbyists than the NAM or AARP to promote their legitimate authority? And, can the states overcome personal, party, and regional alliances (not to mention internal disputes) to act in concert—the only time they have been truly effective in the past?

There will be no easy answers—just hard questions.





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Founding Fathers signing a document JULY 2008

Politics

Social Contract
Liberty
Gun Control
Federalism
State Solutions
Government
Legislative Process
Campaign Finance
Redistricting
Political Parties

The Economy

Free Markets
Government Role
Environment
Infrastructure - Government
Infrastructure - Politics
Agriculture
Labor Unions

Law

Common Law
Criminal Justice
Border Security
Prisons

Society

Pluralism
National Service
Equality
Education
Health Care
Immigration
Minimum Wage
Abortion
Religion

California

Politics
Legislative Process
Redistricting
Term Limits
Infrastructure
The Economy
Law
Society
Education
Healthcare
Immigration
Environment

Foreign Policy

Foreign Policy

Publisher's Letter

"Policy Today" - There Is None
The States Have to Stand Together-but How?
Governments, like clocks, go from the motion men give them
Visitors: 1029705