Policy Today

March 2017                    Circulation 70,621
Policy, Prisons and People PDF Print E-mail
Written by PT Editors   
Tuesday, 13 March 2007
Digg!

Image

In thinking about our criminal justice system, the challenge is to ask the right questions.

This issue of PT looks into the legal principle of criminal justice. As with any policy discussion, the initial challenge is to ask the right questions: (1) What is our criminal justice system trying to accomplish? (2) Why? (3) How do we get there?

Historically, our objectives have included the "3 R's," rehabilitation, restitution, and retribution, with emphasis on the latter. Why? Because the focus has been on apprehending miscreants rather than preventing their criminal behavior in the first place. We've implemented the policy by building more prisons, hiring more guards, creating larger police forces and enforcing mandatory sentences and harsher penalties.

Policy-makers, however, are increasingly understanding the importance of a fourth objective: deterrence. The reasons are obvious: it could free up a lot of money for more socially-desirable objectives as well as actually making our society safer—the ultimate objective.

The challenge is not insignificant: The underlying network supporting an effective criminal justice system has been weakened by the disappearance of strong family, church, and cultural restraints, which deter criminal conduct. They have been replaced by structural changes in society which, to the contrary, foster the growth and spread of anti-social behavior: the transformation of a local and closely-knit rural society into a depersonalized and anonymous urban one; an increasing gap between wealth and poverty; a cult of violence reinforced by the media; and changing cultural values that place greater emphasis on material accumulation than on humanistic or social achievements.

An overburdened court system enters too late in the process to effectively cope with the problem, and must then deal "fairly" with the criminal who has arrived at its doorstep. Moreover, the means at the court's disposal are generally inadequate to the task: the judge has the option of putting the criminal back on the street or sending him to a prison where he is further brutalized and educated in criminal behavior.

Our criminal justice policies should embrace the system as a whole—what are we really trying to accomplish? What is the most effective way to get there?





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

busy
 
< Prev
Founding Fathers signing a document JULY 2008

Politics

Social Contract
Liberty
Gun Control
Federalism
State Solutions
Government
Legislative Process
Campaign Finance
Redistricting
Political Parties

The Economy

Free Markets
Government Role
Environment
Infrastructure - Government
Infrastructure - Politics
Agriculture
Labor Unions

Law

Common Law
Criminal Justice
Border Security
Prisons

Society

Pluralism
National Service
Equality
Education
Health Care
Immigration
Minimum Wage
Abortion
Religion

California

Politics
Legislative Process
Redistricting
Term Limits
Infrastructure
The Economy
Law
Society
Education
Healthcare
Immigration
Environment

Foreign Policy

Foreign Policy

Publisher's Letter

"Policy Today" - There Is None
The States Have to Stand Together-but How?
Governments, like clocks, go from the motion men give them
Visitors: 1027651